The Yap Controversy and Its Significance

Rattan, Sumitra (January 1972). "The Yap Controversy and Its Significance". The Journal of Pacific History. 7 (1): 124–136. doi:10.1080/00223347208572204. ISSN 1469-9605 0022-3344, 1469-9605 .

• Has attachment: File:GR5PGVY6.pdf

Abstract: The article titled “The Yap Controversy and Its Significance” by Sumitra Rattan, published in The Journal of Pacific History, delves into the geopolitical and diplomatic tensions surrounding the disposition of the island of Yap following World War I. The primary focus is on the negotiations and conflicts arising from Japan’s mandate over the island and the strategic interest held by the United States in the Pacific region.

Japan’s intent to fortify its position in the Pacific during the early 1920s raised concerns for the United States, which aimed to maintain open trade routes and strategic naval access. The article discusses the diplomatic exchanges, memoranda, and proposals made between Japan, the U.S., and their Allies. A key point was the U.S.'s demand for an “open-door policy” in trade, opposing any restriction that might be enforced by Japan and advocating for free passage of naval and commercial ships. The discussions also touched upon treaty obligations and rights of American citizens in the mandated territories.

The controversy also involved debates about the mandate granted to Japan by the Allied Powers, which the U.S. did not recognize in full. Various diplomatic communications highlight the clash between Japanese ambitions and American strategic interests. Efforts to reach a diplomatic resolution revolved around ensuring that rights and access for American entities were secured, and the strategic balance in the Pacific was not disrupted by Japanese militarization.

Extra details:

MAG: 2063502500
OpenAlex: W2063502500
CorpusID: 162359291