A Summary of Archaeological Work in Micronesia Since 1977

From Habele Institute

Cordy, Ross (1982-01-01). "A Summary of Archaeological Work in Micronesia Since 1977". Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association. 3 (0): 118–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v3i0.11197 Check |doi= value (help). ISSN 0156-1316 1835-1794, 0156-1316 Check |issn= value (help).

Abstract: “A summary of archaeological work in Micronesia since 1977” provides a comprehensive review of archaeological activities undertaken in Micronesia since mid-1977. Directed and guided by the Historic Preservation Office’s archaeological research program, this paper offers a brief synopsis of the endeavors initiated by Thomas King during his tenure beginning in mid-1977.

The article is structured to first introduce the background of the archaeological program, highlighting the general categories of researchers and their work in the Trust Territory. It also discusses efforts to diversify the nature of archaeological research in Micronesia, moving beyond traditional studies of origins and chronology to incorporate varied research interests. This strategic shift in research focus has proven successful, broadening the scope and impact of archaeological work in the region.

The paper provides a detailed summary of research conducted across various districts, including the Marshall Islands, Kosrae, Ponape (Pohnpei), Truk (Chuuk), Yap, and Palau. For instance, significant findings in the Marshall Islands include a diverse shell artifact assemblage and settlement patterns comprising over 100 sites on Majuro and Arno. In Kosrae, models have been established for village settlement patterns and social organization, although the origin-focused studies yielded limited findings on this specific topic.

Research in Ponape (Pohnpei) has involved delineating the borders of significant sites like Nan Madol and conducting predictive site pattern models. Similarly, in Palau, numerous surveys and test excavations were conducted across various islands, contributing to the broader understanding of Micronesian archaeology. The article concludes with a summary acknowledging the substantial increase in archaeological information gathered from Micronesia over the past several years. While this progress marks a significant start, many early sites and assemblages remain unexplored, with ongoing research still needed to uncover the full historical narrative of the region.